NWAQ wrote: A less touchy mode for selections of parameters as opposed to stuff like filters or other paramers which are more scale-like, selecting waveforms etc is a bit iffy sometimes with the rotaries. Maybe even being able to use the arrow keys to go through values on a selected parameter?
Push knob to incremnt/cycle through? Would seem to be easily do-able.
As for Kylie, I think they are much more likely to implement Dannii first then upgrade to Kylie if it seems popular...
Amanita wrote: NWAQ wrote: A less touchy mode for selections of parameters as opposed to stuff like filters or other paramers which are more scale-like, selecting waveforms etc is a bit iffy sometimes with the rotaries. Maybe even being able to use the arrow keys to go through values on a selected parameter?
Push knob to incremnt/cycle through? Would seem to be easily do-able.
As for Kylie, I think they are much more likely to implement Dannii first then upgrade to Kylie if it seems popular...
- reconfigurable order of filters: i'd love to be able to put a hipass before the ladder, for example.
- midi output: it would be great if even just the minikeys on the built in keyboard would send midi, so i could input notes on the monomachine the same way as i do on the A4. Also, it seems like the CV track could theoretically be used as a midi track without totally changing the OS structure.
- more effects: i'd like to use some of the effects from the Octatrack, like the compressor. it's a bit clunky if i'm running the A4 into the octatrack if i just want to compress my bassline, for example, without effecting the lead lines as well. having this built into the A4 would solve the problem.
darenager wrote: Sine wave (without using filter) then Wavefolder then
Wavefolder or triangle shaping is a must if possible, which judging by the triangle fix it is. Ill add frequency modulation, which possibly isnt (unless they can make the LFO's pitch tracking oscillators?).
Seriously though, the A4 will be PLENTY good enough for me without UW.
