hup, here's another:
i find the swing function a bit too limiting for playing outside the 16/32 step grid. as i understood it the internal resolution of the sequencer is something like 1/96th so why not make use of that? machines would have a 'shift parameter' that would make paramlocked steps shift x 1/96th steps up or down the sequence thus allowing for much less quantized pattern making. (yeah yeah i know the machines' parameter pages are full...)
in the SPS-2 this could be pushed further by regarding a pattern as a timeline instead of a sequence of steps. there would be a 'lock' mode where the steps stick to a grid with setable resolution (1/16, 1/24, 1/32,...) and a 'free' mode where steps are freely moveable over the timeline. of course mixing the 2 modes would be possible and in combination with a graphic display of the timeline this would be sooooooo powerfull...
(should i patent this?